- NPR: How TV Can Make Kids Better Readers
- New York Times on how to use marketing to convince children to eat vegetables
- Wired: How to apply game theory to parenting
- Mike Caulfield: “We have personalization [of learning] backwards”
- Catlin Tucker: “Invest in innovation [in teaching]”
- Catlin Tucker: Reasons to deliver content in the classroom as if you were “flipping the classroom” (i.e. through videos, readings, etc.)
- Work in Progress: It’s not as easy as it looks and that’s ok
- Mike Caulfield: “Choral Explanations” about sites (e.g. Quora and Stack Exchange) that let people explain the same idea in a variety of ways — very interesting read.
- Mike Caulfield: “A Reminder: What students do is hard”
- Mike Caulfied: “Plans vs. Planning”
- EdSurge: How to improve the security of Chromebooks when they aren’t at school
- Nettrice Gaskins: How Science Fiction and Marvel’s Black Panther make STEAM Relevant to Historically Oppressed and Under-represented Students – I wonder if there is a good parallel in the Classical world
- The Economist: How to make a good teacher
- EdSurge: The Role of Architecture in Education
- EdSurge: Why iPads (in 1:1 classes) have a positive impact on education
- EdSurge: Having students summarize a political campaign into social media – an interesting idea for asking students to synthesize and summarize information. I wonder how well this would work with ancient politics
- EdSurge: A podcast about teaching empathy
- EdSurge: Strategies to overcome some struggles to implement Project-based learning
- EdSurge: Strategies for reinforcing/sharing the ideas of the growth mindset into your literature, science, and history classes — my earlier post on this mindset
- Teacher uses Star Trek for difficult conversations about race and gender
- EdSurge: 5 ways teachers can encourage deeper learning with personal devices – many of these suggestions are also appropriate for teaching students how to be more technologically literate
- Photos For Class – a website that provides Creative Commons photos
- Screencastify – an app that allows you to create videos of your computer screen and you voice-over. It saves files in only a few extensions and it can save files to Google Drive easily — this site has a review.
- EdSurge: Using Project-based learning to bring creativity into the classroom
- Chronicle Vitae: It’s Time to Ditch Our Deadlines
- Catlin Tucker: A New Program and a New Approach to Homework
- Chronotope: The Semmelweiss Reflex: Why does Education Ignore Important Research? – with helpful links to neuroscience articles
- NeaToday – The Lasting Impact of Mispronouncing Students’ Names
- Catlin Tucker: 21st Century Version of Ask 3 before You Ask Me which might do well to be read in concert with Mike Caulfield: Choral Explanations and his post on “We have personalization [of learning] backwards”
- ChronicleVitae: No, Banning Laptops is not the answer – a good read for more than just the focus on laptops
- EdSurge: When Teachers Build EdTech, Awesomeness Ensues and Here’s Why
- Michael Feldstein: Student-centered education in software
- Catlin Tucker: Ditching Traditional Grades & My Online Gradebook
- EdSurge: The Secrets of Successful Virtual Co-Teaching
- EdSurge: Why the Growth Mindset isn’t working… yet
- Chronicle Vitae: Imposter Syndrome is definitely a thing
- Chronicle Vitae: Advice on being Advised
- Hapgood: Yes, Digital Literacy. But which one?
- Chronicle Vitae: A Plan is better than luck
- Chronicle Vitae: No, We’re not teaching composition all wrong (responding to “Are we teaching composition all wrong?“
- Chronotope: Amused to Death: Why the Internet should be kept out of the classroom
- Hapgood: The impulse to dive deeper
- Chronicle Vitae: Rethinking my exams
- Tim Harford: The Problem with Facts
- Guardian: My elite, segregated education changed me – but not in the way you’d think
- Eidolon: Ne plus ultra – Classics beyond the tenure track
- Mind/Shift: How Schools Can Help Students Develop A Greater Sense of Purpose
- Edsurge: Study Finds Classroom-Response ‘Clickers’ can ‘Impede Conceptual Understanding”
- Edsurge: As LinkedIn’s Video Library Grows, Company Says it Has no Plans to Compete with Colleges — the interview in this piece also talks about how provide better online content
- Grit, Grace, and Growth Mindset: This I believe [about leadership]
- An EdSurge piece about the importance of meeting with students regularly to discuss progress and goals
- Chronicle Vitae: How to undermine your own authority (and encourage more active engagement by students)
- Chronicle Vitae: Why I don’t edit their rough drafts
- Chronicle Vitae: Obsessed with smartness
- Chronicle Vitae: Scholars talk writing: Advice from an editor
- Chronicle Vitae: Mastering the boring basics
- Chronicle Vitae: The Distracted Classroom
- Chronicle Vitae: Conserving your teaching energy (heavily focused on a lecturing style with good tips at the end for healthy living)
- Chronicle Vitae: Stalled in the writing
- Chronicle Vitae: A tenure track for teachers
- Chronotope: Five things I wished I knew when I started teaching
- Hapgood: The power of explaining to others
Last week’s post focused on Bloom’s Taxonomy of Cognitive Learning. Today’s post focuses on Krathwohl’s Taxonomy of the Affective Domain which focuses on perceptions, feelings, emotions, and belief systems. And the emotional side of things cannot simply be ignored, even if many of our learning objectives and course aims focus on the cognitive domain. Unlike the taxonomy of cognitive learning, I think the “verbs” in learning objectives are less helpful for understanding the affective domain taxonomy than examples. So here are the levels of affective learning and examples:
|Receiving||A person is aware of, or sensitive to, ideas, material, or phenomena and is willing to tolerate them.||
|Responding||A person not only responds to a phenomenon but reacts to it in some way.||
|Valuing||A person shows some involvement or commitment to a new item. These ideas are often considered under “attitude” and “appreciation.”||
|Organization||A person relates a new value to the other values that they already hold and attempts to bring them together into an internally consistent philosophy.||
|Characterization||A person actions consistently with their values and internalized philosophy.||
This taxonomy is more difficult to assess, and some of these categories are very broad. Nevertheless, I think it is very helpful when we try to understand students’ behavior and think about responding to students’ declining resilience and emotional health.
Many of our thoughts about students’ behavior are in the “Receiving” and “Responding” levels. Did students do their homework? Did they even know about the homework? Did they do it well? Did students know that Caesar was dictator of Rome? (Affective: Receiving) Did students answer the question about Caesar’s dictatorship correctly? (Affective: Responding, Cognitive: Remembering/Knowledge)
But the other levels are incredibly important. Students may not do the homework, or do it well, if they do not value the assignment or the subject we teach. Students’ resilience and emotional health are also tied up in the “Valuing,” “Organization,” and “Characterization” levels. These are some of the hardest things to teach, so it is no surprise that some students struggle with them. Indeed, there are also ethical issues involved:
- Is it right to change students’ attitudes and values?
- What differentiates changing students’ values from indoctrination?
- How do we guard against students adopting unwanted values, such as racism?
How do we help students move from “Receiving” and “Responding” to, at least, “Valuing”?
Recent educational research, summarized by Thomas Koballa on a Carleton College website, offers several insights to helping motivate students:
- Motivation can be intrinsic (reading Latin because it’s fun) or extrinsic (reading Latin because I want an A in Latin class).
- Learning goals focus on the challenge and mastery of a task, but performance goals are often related to social status, pleasing teachers, and avoiding “extra” work. Many of us many focus on the former and our students on the latter.
- When students believe they have more control over a task or assignment (i.e. self-determination), they will benefit more from the task. This can be as simple as choosing partners for group work or choosing from a list of possible essay topics, or it can be as complex as designing one’s own assignment.
- A student’s confidence in their ability to perform a given task to achieve a desired goal (i.e. self-efficacy) can be very important.
- Anxiety is normal, and moderate amounts of anxiety motivate learning.
With these insights into motivation, how do we actually motivate students and make sure they are at least in the “Responding,” if not “Valuing” or higher categories? According to a summary, and bibliography, of research by Karin Kirk:
- Give frequent, positive feedback that supports students’ confidence.
- Encourage their belief in self-efficacy by assigning tasks that are not too easy nor too difficult.
- Create an open and positive environment in the classroom and school.
- Help students feel like they are valued within the learning community.
- Create learning activities that are relevant to students’ lives. Use local examples, events in the news, popular technology, and connections to students’ culture and lives (i.e. Expanding the canon).
- Provide choices for partners, assignments, and/or test questions.
- Seek and provide students with additional role models, such as guest speakers, fellow students, or other peers.
- Use models that students can identify with because of gender, ethnicity, social circles, interests, clothing, or age. These can be characters in stories, Romans, scholars, and/or tutors.
- Encourage a sense of belonging and community. Group work helps, but a teacher can also help a lot by being warm, open, enthusiastic, friendly, helpful, and prepared and by encouraging student participation.
- Be supportive: listen, give hints and encouragement, show empathy, and respond to students’ questions and concerns. Mid-term course evaluations are a more formal way of showing this.
- When students are struggling academically, have low confidence, or low motivation, strategize with them and encourage metacognition.
Resources about Krathwohl’s Taxonomy
- Krathwohl’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives 2: Affective Domain
- Don Clark’s explanation of this taxonomy
- Olenka Bilash’s explanation of this taxonomy
- EdPsych’s explanation of this taxonomy
- The University of Connecticut’s very helpful explanation of this taxonomy
- Carleton College’s further bibliography about the affective domain, attitudes, and motivation
- My earlier, less research-based posts on motivating students and making Classics matter
A few weeks ago, one of my Intensive Elementary Latin students asked me “What is a good grade for this class?” After I answered her, the question stuck with me. The next day in class, I reminded my students that they had only started learning Latin at the end of August and that they really had learned a lot since then, so they should feel good about their progress. Her question has still stuck with me. Whenever I come back to this question, my thoughts for the students are: “Are you satisfied with your grade given how much you have invested in the class?” and more so “Are you happy with what you’ve learned?” As a teacher, my thoughts come back to: what have my students learned? Are they on the right path to where I want them to be? So then, I need to know: where do I want them to be? That’s what the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) tell me.
Since Intensive Latin is a regularly offered course that fits into a Latin sequence, the SLOs were written for me. Through the SLOs, the Department of Classics told me where my students should know at the end of the semester and at the end of the school year (If it were not a regularly offered class, I would have written my own. Tweeking or adding to pre-fabricated SLOs to fit your own preferences for the course are also helpful to make the class your own.). Recently, I have found these SLOs very helpful for me to remind me what my students should be focused on.
And that’s the key: designing the course around the SLOs so that you achieve them. When I taught Roman Civilization, my major activity was a paper that I wanted my students to use primary sources in order to write. With that goal and due date in mind, I worked backwards using Bloom’s Taxonomy to figure out what skills to teach when so that my students could analyze ancient literature well enough to write their papers. Now, with Latin, I know that I need to go through the grammar covered by our textbook, but I also need to prepare my students to read (and enjoy and discuss) non-textbook Latin at the end of the year (and for next school year). That goal has been in my mind more often recently as I choose assignments or search for passages that are not just about teaching them grammar, but about reading Latin.
These goals have been good to remember 2/3 of the way through the semester. Remembering the SLOs helps me stay on track and teach what I should teach.